Jump-Starting Your Estate Plan in Utah

Like so many things in life, taking care of your estate planning now is the right step, even if you don’t have any dependents. It’s a weight off your shoulders, and it leaves plans in place if the unthinkable were to happen to you.

It is official – 2014 is here to stay. Getting your estate plan in order should be on they top of your list of resolutions. How do you get started and get your planning squared away before 2015 rolls around?

Understandably, musing over matters of your own disability and death are not at the top of anyone’s list of “fun things to do,” they are a matter of personal, adult responsibility. In addition, plans can get rather complex when it comes to complex lives, complex families, and complex assets. As with most complex but essential matters in life, it is best to start with the basics.

Fortunately, U.S. News & World Report has helped you jump-start your estate planning basics with a recent article titled “4 Steps for Simple Estate Planning.” What are the four?

  1. Prepare a master information document. You should have a single collection of all the information your heirs will need from the location of important documents, to bank accounts, passwords, and lists of assets. Such information allows your heirs to step in when the time comes and to quickly assume command of what needs to be done, to the benefit of all of your loved ones.
  2. Purchase a term life insurance policy. Calculate the financial costs your loved ones might bear in your absence. Oftentimes, as good solution is life insurance which provides instant liquidity just when needed most.
  3. Write a will to ensure the right persons receive your possessions. Not only do you need to draft a will, but you need to keep it current. If you have a will with a few years on it, then it is time to dust it off and bring it up-to-date.
  4. Include guardianship plans in your will for your dependents. Assets aside, the most important “assets” for the parents of minor children are those children. Who would rear them to adulthood in your absence?

Take a look at the original article. You will enjoy the stories and bits of advice it offers as you consider your own plan. Although these four steps are important, they are by no means exhaustive. What issues arise when you ponder your own estate plan and how can they be resolved? Procrastination is simply not an option. Once you understand and appreciate what is at stake, bring in competent counsel to assist you and your family.

Reference: U.S. News & World Report (December 17, 2013) “4 Steps for Simple Estate Planning

Appealing Medicare Matters

Can You Appeal If Medicare Refuses to Cover Care You Received? Absolutely. 

Medicare can be a tricky thing. It comes with a bureaucracy that can seem nearly impregnable, too. So what happens when Medicare denies a beneficiary’s claim for care? While it is not always smooth sailing, it is important to know that you are not without recourse. You can appeal Medicare decisions to refuse coverage for needed care, and sometimes you simply must.

Claim denial is a pretty sticky situation. When you cannot navigate your way through a change of care or providers, or if you have been stuck with a bill that truly ought to have been covered, you can appeal by following a few stages. ElderLawAnswers recently updated its handy guide not too long ago, providing an answer to the question “Can You Appeal If Medicare Refuses to Cover Care You Received?

Essentially there is a Medicare review process. Through this process the federal government works with the intermediaries involved to sort out the problem (e.g., it could be as simple as a billing code error). If no relief is obtained, then the matter can be brought to court if the amount in question exceeds $1000 to $2000 (yes, the amount varies depending on the claim itself). While no one relishes a trip to the courthouse, you can either represent yourself, be represented by a personal representative, or even be represented by your own attorney.

A helpful statistic: “The Medicare Rights Center estimates that only about 2 percent of Medicare beneficiaries appeal denials of care, but 80 percent of those who appeal Part A denials and 92 percent who appeal Part B denials win more care.”

The appeal process has even resulted in major changes to the system itself.  For example, the recent agreement of CMS to change its use of  “observation status”

Reference: ElderLawAnswers (mod. December 19, 2013) “Can You Appeal If Medicare Refuses to Cover Care You Received?

Win-Win: Selling Your Utah Company Stock To Employees

For [some business owners], let’s call them the “able but not quite ready to retire” business owners, the thought of handing off the business they built and walking away is an unsettling, if not gut-wrenching, decision. For these business owners that have also established their business as a corporation (not an option for partnerships), an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (or ESOP) may provide a better retirement option.

Selling your business when it comes time (or nearly time) to retire is a bittersweet moment for a number of reasons. The bitter can come in entirely different ways. For example, selling the business can either mean saying goodbye to it forever or, what may be worse, selling yourself as an “employee” to the company you no longer own for those last years leading up to retirement.

Alternatively, an ESOP may be an interesting option to consider to sweeten up that bittersweet decision. Curious? Take a look at a recent article in Forbes titled “How ESOPs Let Employees Take Stock In Your Retirement.

The first question for the uninitiated (quite forgivably) is what is an ESOP? An ESOP, or “Employee Stock Option Plan,” is technically a retirement plan. However, unlike most retirement plans an ESOP effectively works to balance the retirement of the owner and the employees by balancing ownership and control.

Here is how it works: The owner essentially sells the stock of the corporation to the employees, but retains much of the corporate structure to control and run the business. In the meantime, the stock itself becomes the retirement plan for the employees who are now working to build the business that is their retirement.

Don’t get too excited yet. There are some significant limitations that must be considered in determining whether your business is suitable for an ESOP. When an ESOP is right, it can be a hole-in-one for all concerned. Take a look at the original article for a review of some of those “moving parts” that can make an ESOP right for a business, or a business right for an ESOP.

If an ESOP sounds like a good fit for you and your business, then be sure to get competent counsel. This is not a do-it-yourself project.

Reference: Forbes (December 27, 2013) “How ESOPs Let Employees Take Stock In Your Retirement

Are Your Chosen Utah Charities Good Stewards Of Your Philanthropy?

Want to better understand the mistakes charities make, so you can do a better job in your own philanthropic endeavors?

Philanthropy is a difficult and certainly imperfect science. You give to do good, right? Nevertheless, it is quite difficult to know when your generosity is actually working to accomplish your charitable goals and when you might be throwing money away.

With the yearly end-of-year run on charitable giving now behind us for 2013, and year-end stresses subsiding, this might be a good time to consider how to approach your philanthropy to do the most good.

Sometimes knowing what not to do is more instructive than a positive lesson. This is true in all of life’s lessons, big and small (think sticking your tongue on a frozen flagpole).  When it comes to charitable giving, a recent article in Barron’s chronicles how well-intentioned charity often fails in its follow-through. The article, titled “Philanthropic Fiascos,” provides a few major real-life examples of incredible generosity squandered, including the failure of positive change in Haiti despite an incredible international outpouring of charitable funds.

More than anything, this article is really a reading list. If you are inclined to do the most good with your philanthropy, then books featured in the article may be worth your read.

Are you already frustrated with your charity of choice? Maybe you worry about inefficiency or ineffectiveness (how the charity spends your money- what percentage is actual spent to benefit those in need), or perhaps even its direction? How do you influence your charity of choice or how do you find a better way? Above all, how do you avoid aiding and abetting a philanthropic fiasco?  These questions should all be answered to your satisfaction before you make further donations to your favorite charity.

Reference: Barron’s (January 6, 2013) “Philanthropic Fiascos

Watch Out! Some States Have Death Taxes! Not Utah But…

State estate taxes? That’s another story. Sixteen states and the District of Columbia impose an estate tax, and some kick in for estates valued at $1 million or less. At that level, estate taxes aren’t just a problem for people who own private planes and beachfront property.

When it comes to taxation, there tends to be a weird tension in the space between state-level taxes and federal-level taxes. Not surprisingly, this tension also springs up with regards to the death tax. We tend to spend so much time talking about the federal estate tax it seems we may forget about the pesky, often dangerous, state estate tax.

Fact: there are state-level estate taxes in many states. The exemption limits on these state estate taxes are often set at levels low enough to tag even middle class families. It is important to note that Utah does not now collect estate tax.  This is merely a policy and therefore can change quickly. Moreover, if you hold property located in states outside of Utah, you may be subject to estate taxes in those states.  Consequently, it can be a big mistake to ignore these state estate taxes to your peril. So, do you have a false sense of security?

The problem with state taxes is that there are, at any given time, 50 moving pieces. Fortunately, Kiplinger sheds important light on the subject of state death taxes in a recent article titled “10 States With the Scariest Death Taxes.

Even if you are living outside of the 20% of estate taxing states, you may own assets that cross into these death tax states. This could be a problem. For that matter, assuming you are still around and kicking, you may retire from your estate tax-free state to a state that has an estate tax.

The original article breaks down estate taxes state by state. However, the scariest state-level death taxes come out of New Jersey, Rhode Island, Minnesota, Oregon, Maryland, New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maine, and Washington.

Do you, your family, or your assets enter into these states? And if so, how do you plan for both the state and the federal estate taxes? More importantly, how do you plan for all 50 state legislatures looking for additional revenue and a highly unpredictable Congress and White House?

Reference: Kiplinger (December 2013) “10 States With the Scariest Death Taxes

Have You Considered Converting your Utah IRA To a Roth IRA?

Congress dangled an incentive for high-income Americans to convert their tax-deferred individual retirement accounts into post-tax plans. Their response was overwhelming. Conversions from regular IRAs to Roth retirement accounts increased more than nine times in 2010, rising to $64.8 billion from $6.8 billion in 2009, according to data released [January 3rd] by the Internal Revenue Service.

The results are in from no less than the IRS themselves. It seems taxpayers have investigated and found the Roth IRA to be an excellent tool for both retirement and estate planning. As reported in Bloomberg on the day of the IRS announcement, conversions from traditional to Roth IRAs increased by nine times in 2010. That was the first year of new laws surrounding the tool, pulling in over 10% of all millionaires with it. Indeed, these numbers mean a Roth IRA is food for thought, especially if you have yet to crunch the numbers for yourself.

For a bit of the history behind the IRS data, have a look at the original Bloomberg article titled “Tax Break for IRA Conversion Lured 10% of Millionaires.” Roth IRAs are just another IRA in that it is an account earmarked for a retirement account. Interestingly, Roth IRAs work backwards by taxing at the time of deposit rather than at the time of withdrawal. That timing is the crucial difference.

In addition, since there is no deferred tax then there is no corresponding rush by the IRS to get you to access the account so they can tax it. As a result, there are no required minimum withdrawals for either you or your beneficiary. This makes it a useful retirement account to have at the ready and an incredibly convenient wealth transfer tool too!

With proper balancing there is much good to be found in Roth IRA accounts as part of your overall plan. While the law still allows, many can convert their traditional IRAs by paying the taxes due on those funds today, to secure both the remaining principal and all future appreciation tax-free.

One important insight from this article in particular, however, is a bit of hesitation over the future of the tool and the tax revenues to be gleaned by the federal government. The 10 year study conducted to support the law found increased revenues, which could only be expected since conversion means paying taxes today so you do not have to pay them 10 (or 50) years from now. What will happen in the future when there is no tax being paid on the appreciation? How will the Roth IRA fare then? Will the IRS try to find a way to tap into this retirement and wealth transfer tool at some point?

Reference: Bloomberg (January 3, 2013) “Tax Break for IRA Conversion Lured 10% of Millionaires

Six Trusts You May Never Have Considered for Your Utah Estate Plan

rusts for burials, Bentleys, blunderbusses, Basset Hounds, Beaujolais and blowhards: Not all trusts fit into the traditional model. Most people will never need any of these. But when they do, one of these obscure arrangements may fill a need in a way that no other arrangement could. It may just be the one thing you need when you have everything else.

A typical estate plan is designed to achieve a variety of goals unique to the one making the plan. Some of those goals may be rather commonplace, but others may be highly specialized. Fortunately, there is a unique trust available whatever the need.

A recent lighthearted Forbes article titled “Six Trusts For The Person Who Has Everything Else” pulled back the curtain for a look into the world of unique trusts for unique circumstances. [Spoiler alert: There are really four trusts, one special bank account, and one misguided attempt to emulate the trust format.]

Here is an overview of how the article described these six trusts:

  1. Totten Trusts: These are specialized bank accounts rather than actual trusts, often known more appropriately described as “payable on death” accounts.  The account allows the depositor to name a beneficiary for the account, and such beneficiary receives the account upon the passing of the depositor entirely outside of probate or, if you are careful, outside the knowledge of your other heirs. The article notes that Totten Trusts are especially well-suited secret heirs, paramours, lopsided giving or other hushed motives, unless the wronged someone has access to bank statements or tax returns.

 

  1. Purpose Trusts: These trusts are not designed for people but for a “purpose.” In this sense it is actually a class of trusts, and amongst the most common purposes is the health, happiness, and continued well-being of a prized and/or pampered pet. Think Leona Helmsley. Then again, the maintenance of a collection is also a strong purpose behind setting up a purpose trust.  In Utah  purpose trusts are call Honorary Trusts.

 

  1. Funeral Trusts: Like the name itself, these trusts are solely designed to ensure the payment of funeral expenses because you believe either your heirs should not be so burdened or you do not trust them to be responsible about it. Basically, you want to make your passing a non-issue. You can always pre-pay for a burial plot or other accoutrement, but the trust gives discretion to a trustee while still footing the bill.  Utah authorizes such trusts in a separate statute that regulates funeral directors.  Under that statute funeral homes are closely regulated.

 

  1. Blind Trusts: This is a trust that leaves you, the trust settlor, blind regarding what your own trust owns, how the investments are doing, or any other information that may compromise you. Namely, you would be compromised if you could accidentally get tagged for an insider trader (an executive holding stock in their own company) or the fact that healthy investments can be politically disadvantageous (note the use of the Blind Trust by many a politician, not least of which being the former presidential nominee Mitt Romney).

 

  1. Rabbi Trusts: No, these trusts have nothing to do with Judaism. On the other hand, they do have everything to do with timing of compensation – salary, bonuses, or other compensation from an employer – to stash that money away while limiting the income tax hit in any given year.

And finally,

  1. Secret Trusts: In the estate planning world, secrets can be manageable if often ill-advised (secrets breed distrust, and distrust breeds long and painful lawsuits for heirs). In reality, the secret trust is not even a trust at all, even if you do keep it secret. Essentially, this is the attempt to emulate a trust by getting an executor to agree, outside of the will, to disperse estate funds in any particular way. That is a tricky spot to be for an executor, a nasty secret for an excluded heir to discover, and an easy way to see everything go downhill after that.

That is a quick list and explanation of unique trusts, and one non-trust as a lesson in what not to do. Read the original article for more in-depth coverage of the topic. So, have you made appropriate estate planning arrangements with a trust or two designed with your goals in mind?

Reference: Forbes (January 2, 2014) “Six Trusts For The Person Who Has Everything Else

Bring Your Family into Your Giving to your Salt Lake Charities

Affluent Americans are committed to building a legacy both by using their wealth in positive ways and by passing their values on to future generations.

Can your philanthropy do more than just help the cause or causes important to you? Yes, as many well-to-do but generous Americans can attest. If you are philanthropically inclined and have an appreciation “for things that matter most,” then why not bless your family as well as your charities as part of your legacy.

To make philanthropy a part of your legacy, you do not have to be a Carnegie to have your name put on this or that building. For most of us, our family is our most important and lasting legacy. Consequently, philanthropy can be what binds a family together and passes down real enduring values to the younger generations, all while doing tangible good today.

This is not automatic. It requires more than estate planning, or even charitable gift planning, but what is called legacy planning. To give you a quick run-down and even a guide, you might consider the ten steps that formed the basis of a recent Private Wealth magazine article titled “10-Step Legacy Planning.

The ten by title alone are:

  1. Identify What Inspires
  2. Create A Giving Mission Statement
  3. Review Giving History
  4. Engage The Next Generation
  5. Research Non-Profit Organizations
  6. Form A [Family] Focused Team
  7. Decide Where To Give
  8. Build The Strategy
  9. Present Customized Recommendations
  10. Implement The Strategy

Be sure to read the original article for the details on these ten steps. In the meantime, there is no time like the present to get started on the first step. So, what “inspires” you?

Reference: Private Wealth (January 7, 2014) “10-Step Legacy Planning

For Want Of A Beneficiary Will The Utah IRA Be Lost?

An IRA account owner or beneficiary died and there was no named beneficiary for the account. The obvious question comes, “Who inherits the account and how do you calculate the required distribution?”

Probate can be a difficult and long process. In fact, anything involving the court system is rarely quick and painless. Fortunately, IRAs can easily transfer to your loved ones outside of probate simply by completing a beneficiary designation form. Well what if there was no beneficiary designation form completed? How do the heirs or the executor figure this one out?

The messy situation of an IRA left without a beneficiary was tackled recently by Ed Slott’s blog, The Slott Report. The article, titled “There is No Beneficiary on the Retirement Account: Now What?,” is the perfect encouragement to ensure that every beneficiary form is filled out and up to date.

The good news is that many accounts have a built-in default to the surviving spouse or children of the owner. The bad new is that is may not comply with your estate plan. More importantly, what if the account has no default? In all likelihood the account will then default to your probate estate and, if the IRA requires MRDs, the IRS may require the amounts to be taken into income within five years instead recalculating the MRD based upon the life of the beneficiary.

Aside from probate itself, there are lots of rules regarding how IRAs can be inherited and used by the inheritor. They must take distributions just like you do, but when the IRA defaults to your probate estate it gets messy – and fast.

The IRA can be assigned/transferred into a properly titled new account, but then again some IRA custodians simply refuse to do this, making the irreversible and catastrophically taxable choice to distribute the entire account to the estate.

Simply put, an IRA not acting like an IRA within the estate plan is messy. It is easily avoidable by filling out the beneficiary form and keeping it up to date. In some situations this requires being proactive. For example, when a surviving spouse inherits an IRA but passes before naming a new designated beneficiary to the account.

Reference: The Slott Report (January 9, 2014) “There is No Beneficiary on the Retirement Account: Now What?

Of Family Gifts And Utah Medicaid Lookback Rules

My mother gave me money in 2009.  Now (2013) she is in a nursing home and needs to get Medicaid.  Does that money need to go back in her account because of Medicaid’s five-year lookback?

Medicaid has some very well-intentioned rules to stop people from taking advantage of the system. Many people set out intending to “beat the system.” It is called fraud. Unfortunately, sometimes the rules intended to stop outright fraud can get in the way of everyday families who want to play by the rules.

The most common problem families run into is the so-called “lookback” period. You can easily run afoul of the 20/20 hindsight of Medicaid and thereby threaten the care your elderly loved one needs. This common conundrum of the lookback period was recently updated in a Q&A and supporting guide produced by ElderLawAnswers. In fact, the common question that sparked the post is the same as the title: “Should I Return Money My Mom Gave Me So She Isn’t Penalized by Medicaid?

The lookback period, as some know all-too-well, is the period that Medicaid looks back through the finances and tax records of an applicant to ensure that they did not give away their assets to pass muster with the means-testing of the program. In Utah the lookback period is 60 months (5 years).  Of course, there are plenty of legitimate scenarios in which an individual would want to give away money or assets only to need Medicaid a few years thereafter.

So, what happens when the tripwire is tripped and your loved one is Medicaid ineligible due to a previous gift made during the lookback period?

This may vary from situation to situation (and state to state), but there are ways of undoing the gift and becoming Medicaid eligible. However, there are some potentially strange tax consequences. Then again, the heir who received the gift can always pay for the care until the loved one is eligible for benefits again. Right?

In either event, the best solution would be to not create the problem in the first place. For information on the lookback and other eligibility problems to Medicaid, consult the ElderLawAnswers master post on the subject (see “Medicaid’s Asset Transfer Rules”). As always this is yet another example of situations that require the expertise of competent counsel before making a financial or legal move now (the gift) that can have serious financial or legal consequences later.

Reference: ElderLawAnswers (mod. January 3, 2014) “Should I Return Money My Mom Gave Me So She Isn’t Penalized by Medicaid?

ElderLawAnswers (mod. September 13, 2013) “Medicaid’s Asset Transfer Rules